On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 8:49 PM, Sebastian Pop <seb...@gmail.com> wrote:
> When setting gloog_error, graphite should continue code generation
> without early returns, as otherwise the SSA representation would not
> be complete.  So set the new expression to integer_zero_node, that
> would not require more SSA updates, and continue code generation as
> nothing happened.

I suppose you have to watch for correct types?  Or does the code get
discarded again before it eventually reaches the verifier?  Ok in that case.

Thanks,
Richard.

> Regstrapping on amd64-linux.
>
> 2011-07-27  Sebastian Pop  <sebastian....@amd.com>
>
>        PR tree-optimization/49876
>        * sese.c (rename_uses): Do not return false on gloog_error: set
>        the new_expr to integer_zero_node and continue code generation.
>        (graphite_copy_stmts_from_block): Remove early exit on gloog_error.
> ---
>  gcc/ChangeLog |    7 +++++++
>  gcc/sese.c    |   18 ++++++++----------
>  2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/gcc/ChangeLog b/gcc/ChangeLog
> index b07d494..a565c18 100644
> --- a/gcc/ChangeLog
> +++ b/gcc/ChangeLog
> @@ -1,5 +1,12 @@
>  2011-07-27  Sebastian Pop  <sebastian....@amd.com>
>
> +       PR tree-optimization/49876
> +       * sese.c (rename_uses): Do not return false on gloog_error: set
> +       the new_expr to integer_zero_node and continue code generation.
> +       (graphite_copy_stmts_from_block): Remove early exit on gloog_error.
> +
> +2011-07-27  Sebastian Pop  <sebastian....@amd.com>
> +
>        PR tree-optimization/49471
>        * tree-ssa-loop-manip.c (canonicalize_loop_ivs): Build an unsigned
>        iv only when the largest type is unsigned.  Do not call
> diff --git a/gcc/sese.c b/gcc/sese.c
> index ec96dfb..04a8e75 100644
> --- a/gcc/sese.c
> +++ b/gcc/sese.c
> @@ -527,10 +527,10 @@ rename_uses (gimple copy, htab_t rename_map, 
> gimple_stmt_iterator *gsi_tgt,
>       if (chrec_contains_undetermined (scev))
>        {
>          *gloog_error = true;
> -         return false;
> +         new_expr = integer_zero_node;
>        }
> -
> -      new_expr = chrec_apply_map (scev, iv_map);
> +      else
> +       new_expr = chrec_apply_map (scev, iv_map);
>
>       /* The apply should produce an expression tree containing
>         the uses of the new induction variables.  We should be
> @@ -540,12 +540,13 @@ rename_uses (gimple copy, htab_t rename_map, 
> gimple_stmt_iterator *gsi_tgt,
>          || tree_contains_chrecs (new_expr, NULL))
>        {
>          *gloog_error = true;
> -         return false;
> +         new_expr = integer_zero_node;
>        }
> +      else
> +       /* Replace the old_name with the new_expr.  */
> +       new_expr = force_gimple_operand (unshare_expr (new_expr), &stmts,
> +                                        true, NULL_TREE);
>
> -      /* Replace the old_name with the new_expr.  */
> -      new_expr = force_gimple_operand (unshare_expr (new_expr), &stmts,
> -                                      true, NULL_TREE);
>       gsi_insert_seq_before (gsi_tgt, stmts, GSI_SAME_STMT);
>       replace_exp (use_p, new_expr);
>
> @@ -621,9 +622,6 @@ graphite_copy_stmts_from_block (basic_block bb, 
> basic_block new_bb,
>                       gloog_error))
>        fold_stmt_inplace (copy);
>
> -      if (*gloog_error)
> -       break;
> -
>       update_stmt (copy);
>     }
>  }
> --
> 1.7.4.1
>
>

Reply via email to