On 07/27/11 13:55, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 01:51:04PM -0500, Aldy Hernandez wrote:
This caused:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49875
The assembler sequence on ia32 was a bit different.
H.J. Can you try this on your end? If it fixes the problem, I will
commit as obvious.
You could test it yourself on x86_64-linux too with
make check -k RUNTESTFLAGS='--target_board=unix\{-m32,-m64\} dg.exp=cxxbit*'
Committed.
PR middle-end/49875
* c-c++-common/cxxbitfields-4.c: Check for smaller than long
moves.
* c-c++-common/cxxbitfields-5.c: Same.
Index: c-c++-common/cxxbitfields-4.c
===================================================================
--- c-c++-common/cxxbitfields-4.c (revision 176824)
+++ c-c++-common/cxxbitfields-4.c (working copy)
@@ -15,4 +15,4 @@ void update_c(struct bits *p, int val)
p -> c = val;
}
-/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-not "movl" } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler "mov\[bw\]" } } */
Index: c-c++-common/cxxbitfields-5.c
===================================================================
--- c-c++-common/cxxbitfields-5.c (revision 176824)
+++ c-c++-common/cxxbitfields-5.c (working copy)
@@ -26,4 +26,4 @@ void foo()
p -> c = 55;
}
-/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-not "movl\t\\(" } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler "mov\[bw\]" } } */
