I've committed this fix for a typo I introduced yesterday (and not testing what
I thought I was testing). Sadly passing a gimple_seq to gsi_replace doesn't
lead to a compile error, but to bad runtime behaviour.
nathan
2015-08-19 Nathan Sidwell <nat...@codesourcery.com>
* omp-low.c (oacc_xform_on_device): Fix thinko in previous change.
Index: gcc/omp-low.c
===================================================================
--- gcc/omp-low.c (revision 226986)
+++ gcc/omp-low.c (working copy)
@@ -14619,14 +14621,14 @@ oacc_xform_on_device (gimple stmt)
#endif
result = fold_convert (integer_type_node, result);
tree lhs = gimple_call_lhs (stmt);
- gimple_seq replace = NULL;
+ gimple_seq seq = NULL;
push_gimplify_context (true);
- gimplify_assign (lhs, result, &replace);
+ gimplify_assign (lhs, result, &seq);
pop_gimplify_context (NULL);
gimple_stmt_iterator gsi = gsi_for_stmt (stmt);
- gsi_replace (&gsi, replace, false);
+ gsi_replace_with_seq (&gsi, seq, false);
}
/* Transform oacc_dim_size and oacc_dim_pos internal function calls to
