On Sun, Aug 16, 2015 at 07:35:17PM +0200, Torvald Riegel wrote: > On Thu, 2015-06-11 at 14:36 +0300, Gleb Fotengauer-Malinovskiy wrote: > > On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 03:04:27PM +0200, Torvald Riegel wrote: > > > On Wed, 2015-05-06 at 17:54 +0300, Gleb Fotengauer-Malinovskiy wrote: > > > > 2015-05-06 Gleb Fotengauer-Malinovskiy <gle...@altlinux.org> > > > > > > > > PR libitm/61164 > > > > * local_atomic (__always_inline): Rename to... > > > > (__libitm_always_inline): ... this. > > > > > > OK. Thanks. > > > > You are welcome. > > > > It seems still not applied, AFAICS. > > I forgot to ask you at Cauldron whether you have completed a copyright > assignment agreement?
No, I didn't. I'm in progress. > I don't think this is small enough to be a > trivial patch. "A regular series of repeated changes, such as renaming a symbol, is not legally significant even if the symbol has to be renamed in many places." https://www.gnu.org/prep/maintain/html_node/Legally-Significant.html#Legally-Significant -- glebfm
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
