Thanks, but the name of the macro was changed in more recent drafts.
-------- Original Message --------
From: Ed Smith-Rowland <3dw...@verizon.net>
Sent: Fri, Aug 7, 2015 03:32 AM
To: gcc-patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>; Jason Merrill <ja...@redhat.com>
CC:
Subject: Change __cpp_concepts to __cpp_experimental_concepts
Jason,
My reading of
1.5 Feature-testing recommendations (Informative)
/2 ... The recommended macro name is __cpp_experimental_ followed by the
string in the “Macro
name suffix” column in Table 1. ...
Says change __cpp_concepts to __cpp_experimental_concepts
Cool beans on getting this in.
Ed
-------------------------------------------------------------------
2015-06-30 Edward Smith-Rowland <3dw...@verizon.net>
* c-family/c-cppbuiltin.c (c_cpp_builtins): Rename __cpp_concepts
to __cpp_experimental_concepts.
-------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Index: gcc/gcc/c-family/c-cppbuiltin.c
===================================================================
--- gcc/gcc/c-family/c-cppbuiltin.c (revision 226714)
+++ gcc/gcc/c-family/c-cppbuiltin.c (working copy)
@@ -868,7 +868,7 @@
if (flag_concepts)
/* Use a value smaller than the 201507 specified in
the TS, since we don't yet support extended auto. */
- cpp_define (pfile, "__cpp_concepts=201500");
+ cpp_define (pfile, "__cpp_experimental_concepts=201500");
if (flag_sized_deallocation)
cpp_define (pfile, "__cpp_sized_deallocation=201309");
}
-------------------------------------------------------------------
