Le 29/07/2015 17:08, Paul Richard Thomas a écrit :
Dear All,
On 24 July 2015 at 10:08, Damian Rouson <dam...@sourceryinstitute.org> wrote:
I love this idea and had similar thoughts as well.
:D
Sent from my iPhone
On Jul 24, 2015, at 1:06 AM, Paul Richard Thomas
<paul.richard.tho...@gmail.com> wrote:
Dear Mikael,
It had crossed my mind also that a .mod and a .smod file could be
written. Normally, the .smod files are produced by the submodules
themselves, so that their descendants can pick up the symbols that
they generate. There is no reason at all why this could not be
implemented; early on in the development I did just this, although I
think that it would now be easier to modify this patch.
One huge advantage of proceeding in this way is that any resulting
library can be distributed with the .mod file alone so that the
private entities are never exposed. The penalty is that a second file
is output.
With best regards
Paul
Please find attached the implementation of this suggestion.
Bootstraps and regtests on FC21/x86_64 - OK for trunk or is the
original preferred?
There hasn't been a lot of voices about this among the other active and
less active team members.
I prefer this "private members to separate smod" variant.
It's OK for trunk as far as I'm concerned.
Thanks.
Mikael
PS: Regarding redundant initializations: rather have too many than too
few. ;-)
