On 07/27/2015 05:12 PM, Patrick Palka wrote:
The only question in my mind is bootstrap & regression testing. From
reading the thread for the earlier version of this patch I got the
impression you had bootstrapped and regression tested earlier versions.
If you could confirm that you've bootstrapped and regression tested this
version it'd be appreciated. You can do it on the individual patches or the
set as a whole.
I think I successfully bootstrapped + regtested this exact version but
I'm not sure. I was going to do so again before committing anyway.
I will fire off a build tonight and confirm the results tomorrow.
Bootstrap + regtest on x86_64-linux-gnu was successful with no new regressions.
Jeff
Hi Jeff. Sorry for the late reply. I would like to commit this
series now (after another bootstrap + regtest cycle) to work on
further refinements to this warning. You clearly approved the last
two out of three patches, but it is not clear whether you approved
this first patch. Could you clarify your stance on this patch?
Thanks again for reviewing.
Sorry for not being explicit. Yes, patch #1 is fine with the bootstrap
& regression test done.
Thanks,
jeff
