On July 29, 2015 6:14:58 PM GMT+02:00, Paolo Carlini <paolo.carl...@oracle.com> wrote: >Hi, > >On 07/28/2015 09:20 AM, Richard Biener wrote: >> This moves/merges the equality folding of decl addresses from >> fold_comparison with that from fold_binary in match.pd. >> >> Bootstrapped and tested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, applied to >trunk. >> >> Richard. >> >> 2015-07-28 Richard Biener <rguent...@suse.de> >> >> * fold-const.c (fold_comparison): Remove equality folding >> of decl addresses ... >> * match.pd: ... here and merge with existing pattern. >I didn't double check with r226298, but I'm pretty sure this change of >yours has to do with the FAIL: > >FAIL: experimental/optional/constexpr/make_optional.cc (test for excess > >errors) >UNRESOLVED: experimental/optional/constexpr/make_optional.cc >compilation >failed to produce executable > >which now we are all seeing. Certainly the FAIL is there with r226299 >and the library was clean a few revisions before. Note that the >testcase >involves comparisons of decl addresses ;)
Yeah, fix is in testing. Richard. >Thanks, >Paolo.
