On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 1:35 AM, Jonathan Wakely <jwak...@redhat.com> wrote: > The 4.9 branch is the oldest one we still support, so should be very > stable now, although C++11 support in 4.9 is still labelled > experimental, and this only changes C++11 code. How important is it to > fix?
Um... I'd say medium importance, for [a-z0-9-] not working in POSIX syntax (while ECMAScript seems to be more popular, which works correctly). If 4.9 is `stable` and expected to be experimetal, which by my definition should only include important changes, we may leave it as is? -- Regards, Tim Shen
