On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 08:35:12AM -0400, David Edelsohn wrote: > On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 5:59 AM, Marek Polacek <pola...@redhat.com> wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 04:23:08PM -0400, David Edelsohn wrote: > >> This seems to have caused a number of new failures in the PPC > >> testsuite for vmx/unpack. > > > > Sorry about that. Should be fixed with this patch I'm about to commit. > > > > 2015-07-21 Marek Polacek <pola...@redhat.com> > > > > * gcc.dg/vmx/unpack-be-order.c: Use -Wno-shift-overflow. > > * gcc.dg/vmx/unpack.c: Likewise. > > This doesn't fully fix the failures. Ouch. What other failures do you see? I've tried the patch on ppc64-linux and didn't see any others.
It'd be very weird to see -Wshift-overflow warnings when -Wno-shift-overflow is in effect. > > --- gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vmx/unpack.c > > +++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vmx/unpack.c > > @@ -1,3 +1,5 @@ > > +/* { dg-options "-Wno-shift-overflow" } */ > > + > > Should this be dg-additional-options ? I did what was in gcc.dg/vmx/unpack-be-order.c, i.e. dg-options. Or does using dg-additional-options help? Marek