Alexander Monakov writes:
>> Attachment is the patch which repair -fno-plt support for AArch64.
>>
>> aarch64_is_noplt_call_p will only be true if:
>>
>> * gcc is generating position independent code.
>> * function symbol has declaration.
>> * either -fno-plt or "(no_plt)" attribute specified.
>> * it's a external function.
>>
>> OK for trunk?
>>
>> 2015-07-16 Jiong Wang <jiong.w...@arm.com>
>>
>> gcc/
>> * config/aarch64/aarch64-protos.h (aarch64_is_noplt_call_p): New
>> declaration.
>> * config/aarch64/aarch64.c (aarch64_is_noplt_call_p): New function.
>> * config/aarch64/aarch64.md (call_value_symbol): Check noplt
>> scenarios.
>> (call_symbol): Ditto.
>
> Shouldn't the same treatment be applied to tailcall (sibcall_{,value_}symbol)
> patterns? I guess it could be done as a followup patch, but would be nice if
> that isn't forgotten.
Thanks for the remaind, that will be done as a followup patch.
--
Regards,
Jiong
