Hi Mikael, hi all, I only had the chance to check with ifort (different versions; including the most recent one) and that compiler is consistent with gfortran as it is now, I.e., the executable segfaults after the function has been called.
I am though curious what other compilers opinion on that point is. Regards, Andre Am 10. Juli 2015 18:20:47 MESZ, schrieb Mikael Morin <mikael.mo...@sfr.fr>: >Hello all, > >I'm not completely convinced by the standard excerpts that have been >quoted about this topic, as they don't have any explicit mention of >allocatable variables/expressions. >For what it's worth, in my opinion, the handling of allocatable that >was >proposed by Andre makes sense to me. It's consistent with what is done >for derived type assignment, the lhs' allocatable components are >deallocated if their rhs counter part are unallocated. Doing the same >for whole objects would be, well, consistent. >What is done by the other compilers? > >Mikael -- Andre Vehreschild * Kreuzherrenstr. 8 * 52062 Aachen Mail: ve...@gmx.de * Tel.: +49 241 9291018
