Fix a copy-and-paste error.

Tested with "make check-jit"; jit.sum remains at 8494 passes.

Committed to trunk as r225559.

gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
        * jit.dg/test-error-gcc_jit_block_end_with_switch-NULL-case.c: Fix
        comments.
---
 ...t-error-gcc_jit_block_end_with_switch-NULL-case.c | 20 ++++----------------
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)

diff --git 
a/gcc/testsuite/jit.dg/test-error-gcc_jit_block_end_with_switch-NULL-case.c 
b/gcc/testsuite/jit.dg/test-error-gcc_jit_block_end_with_switch-NULL-case.c
index 07a9848..009ad66 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/jit.dg/test-error-gcc_jit_block_end_with_switch-NULL-case.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/jit.dg/test-error-gcc_jit_block_end_with_switch-NULL-case.c
@@ -6,25 +6,12 @@
 
 #include "harness.h"
 
+/* Try to create a switch statement with a NULL case, so that
+   we can verify that we get a sane error message.  */
+
 void
 create_code (gcc_jit_context *ctxt, void *user_data)
 {
-  /* Let's try to inject the equivalent of:
-      int
-      test_switch (int x)
-      {
-       switch (x)
-         {
-         case x:
-            return 3;
-
-         default:
-            return 10;
-         }
-      }
-      and verify that we get a sane error about the non-const
-      case.
-   */
   gcc_jit_type *t_int =
     gcc_jit_context_get_type (ctxt, GCC_JIT_TYPE_INT);
   gcc_jit_type *return_type = t_int;
@@ -44,6 +31,7 @@ create_code (gcc_jit_context *ctxt, void *user_data)
   gcc_jit_block *b_default =
     gcc_jit_function_new_block (func, "default");
 
+  /* Erroneous NULL case.  */
   gcc_jit_case *cases[1] = {
     NULL
   };
-- 
1.8.5.3

Reply via email to