On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 05:30:21PM +0100, Matt Thomas wrote: > > > On Jun 19, 2015, at 8:51 AM, Jan-Benedict Glaw <jbg...@lug-owl.de> wrote: > > > > Hi James, > > > > On Tue, 2015-06-16 10:58:48 +0100, James Greenhalgh > > <james.greenha...@arm.com> wrote: > >> The testcase in this patch, from libgcc, causes an ICE in the Vax > >> build. > > [...] > >> As far as I know, reload is going to get rid of these SUBREGs > >> for us, so we don't need to modify the output statement. > >> > >> Tested that this restores the VAX build and that the code-gen is > >> sensible for the testcase. > >> > >> OK? > > > > Looks good to me, but Matt has to ACK this fix. > > I so ACK. >
Now that this has had a few days sitting on trunk without seeing any complaints, would you mind if I backported it to the GCC 5 branch? Thanks, James
