On 06/24/2015 04:28 PM, Mikhail Maltsev wrote:
It can probably be fixed like this:diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/diagnostic/inhibit-warn-2.C b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/diagnostic/inhibit-warn-2.C index cb16b4c..f658c1d 100644 --- a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/diagnostic/inhibit-warn-2.C +++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/diagnostic/inhibit-warn-2.C @@ -26,11 +26,11 @@ class D { template <class Expr> typename A<F<typename C<Expr>::type>::value || B::value>::type - operator=(Expr); // { dg-message "declared" } + operator=(Expr); // { dg-message "private" } }; void fn1() { D opt; - opt = 0; // { dg-error "private" } + opt = 0; // { dg-error "this context" } } But I am not sure, what should I do in this case. Maybe it is better to remove the failing testcase from GCC 5 branch (provided that inhibit-warn-1.C tests a fix for the same bug and does not fail)?
This patch is OK (and, I think, obvious). I think it's better to keep the testcase.
Jason
