On 07/22/2011 10:00 AM, Eric Botcazou wrote: >> It's getting confused about loads/stores being control_flow_insns and >> getting scheduled past each other nonetheless. Mind testing the following? > > s/flag_non_call_exceptions/cfun->can_throw_non_call_exceptions/ >
Why test either, since control_flow_insn_p has already done so? r~
