On 06/25/2015 04:27 PM, Sebastian Pop wrote:
On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 5:00 AM, Richard Biener
<richard.guent...@gmail.com> wrote:
Yes, it looks good. What about COMPLEX_CST and VECTOR_CST and
their types?
The question came around also when we were looking at these problems:
we really only care for integer_cst constants (I in ISL stands for integer ;-)
I think we can also discard those, though we do not have a test-case yet.
Probably we can write one from the real_cst test and add it with the patch.
Would it not make sense to use a positive list here, instead of trying
to find all types where this does _not_ work?
Tobias
