On 06/08/2015 06:58 PM, DJ Delorie wrote:
The testcase for pr 66345 assumes size_t is "unsigned long" instead of
using the real type, which causes failures on some 16-bit targets.
Ok?
Also, I note that some tests check for __SIZE_TYPE__ as I do below,
and others use it unconditionally as a replacement for size_t. Is
there a convention?
I doubt there's a well defined convention. Particularly for the torture
tests, many of which are very very old.
* gcc.dg/torture/pr66345.c: Fix assumption about size_t type.
OK.
jeff
