On 06/17/2015 10:23 AM, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 06/15/2015 07:14 PM, Ed Smith-Rowland wrote:
I wanted to fix it up as per your suggestion. If someone wants it now I
can retest and commit. Otherwise give me a bit more time.
Someone in LWG was asking about it, and I figured it wouldn't hurt to
have this version in now. Glad to hear you're working on the
improvement as well, thanks!
Jason
I tried the obvious: an error message with %qE and got 'false'.
constexpr values are evaluated early on.
Is there a possibility that late folding could help or is that
completely different?
Ed
