> >>       PR middle-end/66325
> >>       * c-decl.c (start_enum): Set TYPE_PACKED consistently among type 
> >> variants.
> >> Index: c-decl.c
> >> ===================================================================
> >> --- c-decl.c  (revision 224250)
> >> +++ c-decl.c  (working copy)
> >> @@ -7946,7 +7946,8 @@
> >>    the_enum->enum_overflow = 0;
> >>
> >>    if (flag_short_enums)
> >> -    TYPE_PACKED (enumtype) = 1;
> >> +    for (tree v = TYPE_MAIN_VARIANT (enumtype); v ;v = TYPE_NEXT_VARIANT 
> >> (v))
> 
> Though I wonder why flag_short_enums was not true when building the
> (main-)variant?

What I believe happens is that there is forward declaration of enum that leads
to biuld incomplete enum type that has no packed flag set.  Then we produce
a type variant and after that we complete the main variant, but do not update
the other variant.

Actually looking into where the variant is updated, it happens in finish_enum
that copies many flags, perhaps it would make more sense to copy TYPE_PACKED
there?

> Looks like -fshort-enums is also 'Optimization', so the above is bogus for
> 
> enum foo {x = 1 };
> 
> void __attribute__((optimize(short-enums))) foo()
> {
>   const enum foo x = 1;
> }
> 
> no?  The main variant is correctly _not_ packed but now you make it
> packed as you reach foo ()?

Perhaps it is defined as Optimization but it does not bind to uses of types:

enum foo {a,b,c};
 __attribute__((optimize("short-enums"))) 
main()
{
  const enum foo x;
  enum bar {a,b,c};
  printf ("%i %i\n",sizeof (x), sizeof(enum bar));
}

prints
4 1

it depends when the main variant is finished.  I wonder if there is any
practical value on support Optimization attribute for this kind of ABI breaking
options.  It may be easier to simply drop the Optimization flag completely from
-fshort-enums and friends.

-fshort-double ICEs at initialization time at least since 4.8.x
$ gcc t.c -fshort-double
<built-in>: internal compiler error: in layout_type, at stor-layout.c:2220
0xafe41b layout_type(tree_node*)
        ../../gcc/stor-layout.c:2219

so I suggest dropping that flag completely.

Honza
> 
> Richard.
> 
> > Please fix the formatting here: no space before ;.
> >
> > Ok with that change.
> >
> >         Marek

Reply via email to