On Thu, 11 Jun 2015, Pierre-Marie de Rodat wrote: > On 06/11/2015 11:06 AM, Richard Biener wrote: > > FYI, I decided to backport the fix causing this regression to the > > 4.8 branch today, guarded with in_lto_p, thus eliminating the effect > > on non-LTO links. The adjusted patch looks like the following and > > I'll also adjust the 4.9 branch accordingly, leaving the GCC 5 branch > > with the original fix. > > That sounds perfect: thank you Richard! I am about to commit the original fix > on mainline: should I still open a bugreport before commiting it to the GCC 5 > branch?
Yes please. Thanks, Richard.
