On Thu, 28 May 2015 16:58:44 +0200 Mikael Morin <mikael.mo...@sfr.fr> wrote:
> Le 27/05/2015 23:09, Steve Kargl a écrit : > > On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 06:24:25PM +0200, Mikael Morin wrote: > >> Le 27/05/2015 16:07, Andre Vehreschild a ?crit : > >>> Hi Paul, hi Mikael, > >>> > >>> about renaming the identifier emitted: I would like to keep it short. > >>> Remember, there is always a number attached to it, which makes it unique. > >>> Furthermore does "alloc_source_tmp" sound unnecessarily long to me. It > >>> tastes like we do not trust the unique identifier mechanism established > >>> in gfortran. But that is just my personal taste. > >>> > >> Then let's go with "source", which seems to get the majority of the > >> votes. It remains an improvement over "expr3" and "atmp". > >> > > > > You do realize that expr3 holds things other than the > > expression in a source= in an allocate, right? > > > I know there is mold. I'm not aware of anything else. > Now that you tell about it, I realize that the code in that area doesn't > seem to check for mold vs source. Which is arbitrary. - Andre -- Andre Vehreschild * Email: vehre ad gmx dot de
