On 07/20/2011 10:51 AM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 20 July 2011 09:38, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
See http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2011-07/msg00368.html
Should code inside namespace __gnu_debug be using std::size_t instead
of assuming ::size_t has been declared?
Or maybe that use (which is the only unqualified size_t I see in
include/debug/* outside of namespace std) should be using size_type
anyway.
Indeed. I applied the below, to resolve this pressing issue, Jonathan
will hopefully provide soon feedback about the naming issue.
Paolo.
/////////////////////
2011-07-20 Paolo Carlini <paolo.carl...@oracle.com>
* include/debug/safe_local_iterator.h (_Safe_local_iterator<>::
_Safe_local_iterator(const _Iterator&, size_type, const _Sequence*)):
Fix typo.
Index: include/debug/safe_local_iterator.h
===================================================================
--- include/debug/safe_local_iterator.h (revision 176499)
+++ include/debug/safe_local_iterator.h (working copy)
@@ -88,7 +88,7 @@
* @pre @p seq is not NULL
* @post this is not singular
*/
- _Safe_local_iterator(const _Iterator& __i, size_t __bucket,
+ _Safe_local_iterator(const _Iterator& __i, size_type __bucket,
const _Sequence* __seq)
: _Safe_local_iterator_base(__seq, _M_constant()), _M_current(__i),
_M_bucket(__bucket)
