yes -- a full solution that supports lazy binding will be nice. David
On Mon, May 4, 2015 at 9:58 AM, Michael Matz <m...@suse.de> wrote: > Hi, > > On Mon, 4 May 2015, Xinliang David Li wrote: > >> The use case proposed by Sri allows user to selectively eliminate PLT >> overhead for hot external calls only. > > Yes, but only _because_ his approach doesn't use lazy binding. With the > full solution such restriction to a subset of functions isn't necessary. > And we should strive for going the full way, instead of adding hacks, > shouldn't we? > > > Ciao, > Michael.
