Jakub Jelinek <ja...@redhat.com> writes:
> On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 04:31:52PM -0700, H.J. Lu wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I checked this patch into gcc-5-branch.
>
> That's wrong according to https://gcc.gnu.org/develop.html#num_scheme
HJ has a point, though: with DEV-PHASE remaining empty, all post-5.1.0
versions of gcc identify as 5.1.1, with no way of telling them apart,
like datestamp and revison.
Rainer
--
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rainer Orth, Center for Biotechnology, Bielefeld University
