2015-05-02 15:03 GMT+02:00 Jonathan Wakely <jwak...@redhat.com>: > Here's a much smaller patch for the gcc5 branch, which just avoids the > small-object optimisation for non-trivially-copyable types. This > pessimises some types, but is safe. > > (Given that this stuff is all "experimental" anyway, maybe we could > just backport the full fix from trunk, but this is OK for now.) > > Tested powerpc64le-linux, committed to gcc-5-branch.
Not related to the patch, but is the second template argument of any::_Storage::_M_buffer really correct: std::aligned_storage<sizeof(_M_ptr), sizeof(_M_ptr)>::type _M_buffer; I would have expected to see this to be an alignment value. - Daniel
