Re: PR65217.c, improve canonicalization of implied copy from equality comparison

[Jeff Law]

On 04/28/2015 01:15 AM, Marek Polacek wrote:

On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 10:07:46PM -0600, Jeff Law wrote:

Thanks for the nice summary in the first part of the mail.  Two typos:

+  /* Most of the time tree_swap_operands_p does what we want.  But there's

Shouldn't that be "there are"?

+     cases where we we know one operand is better for copy propagation than

Redundant "we".

Thanks.  Fixed in the obvious way.

jeff