On 8 April 2015 at 20:32, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer <rep.dot....@gmail.com> wrote: > gcc/ChangeLog:
OKed by Jeff and committed to trunk as r222312. thanks, > > 2015-04-01 Bernhard Reutner-Fischer <al...@gcc.gnu.org> > > * tree-tailcall.c (suitable_for_tail_opt_p, find_tail_calls): > Remove unneeded forward declarations. > (suitable_for_tail_call_opt_p): Commentary typo fix. > > Signed-off-by: Bernhard Reutner-Fischer <rep.dot....@gmail.com> > --- > gcc/tree-tailcall.c | 4 +--- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/gcc/tree-tailcall.c b/gcc/tree-tailcall.c > index 1d065fb..013972d 100644 > --- a/gcc/tree-tailcall.c > +++ b/gcc/tree-tailcall.c > @@ -165,10 +165,8 @@ struct tailcall > accumulator. */ > static tree m_acc, a_acc; > > -static bool suitable_for_tail_opt_p (void); > static bool optimize_tail_call (struct tailcall *, bool); > static void eliminate_tail_call (struct tailcall *); > -static void find_tail_calls (basic_block, struct tailcall **); > > /* Returns false when the function is not suitable for tail call optimization > from some reason (e.g. if it takes variable number of arguments). */ > @@ -182,7 +180,7 @@ suitable_for_tail_opt_p (void) > return true; > } > /* Returns false when the function is not suitable for tail call optimization > - from some reason (e.g. if it takes variable number of arguments). > + for some reason (e.g. if it takes variable number of arguments). > This test must pass in addition to suitable_for_tail_opt_p in order to > make > tail call discovery happen. */ > > -- > 2.1.4 >
