We currently fail to handle bitfield precision BIT_NOT_EXPRs properly and miscompile the testcase below. Fixed by properly truncating to bitfield precision if required. Do that by expanding the NOT to a proper XOR instead of doing the truncation via a AND though.
Bootstrap and regtest pending on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu. Richard. 2011-07-18 Richard Guenther <rguent...@suse.de> * expr.c (expand_expr_real_2): Properly truncate the BIT_NOT_EXPR expansion result to bitfield precision if required. * gcc.dg/torture/20110718-1.c: New testcase. Index: gcc/expr.c =================================================================== --- gcc/expr.c (revision 176386) +++ gcc/expr.c (working copy) @@ -8037,7 +8037,15 @@ expand_expr_real_2 (sepops ops, rtx targ VOIDmode, EXPAND_NORMAL); if (modifier == EXPAND_STACK_PARM) target = 0; - temp = expand_unop (mode, one_cmpl_optab, op0, target, 1); + /* In case we have to reduce the result to bitfield precision + expand this as XOR with a proper constant instead. */ + if (reduce_bit_field) + temp = expand_binop (mode, xor_optab, op0, + immed_double_int_const + (double_int_mask (TYPE_PRECISION (type)), mode), + target, 1, OPTAB_LIB_WIDEN); + else + temp = expand_unop (mode, one_cmpl_optab, op0, target, 1); gcc_assert (temp); return temp; Index: gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/torture/20110718-1.c =================================================================== --- gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/torture/20110718-1.c (revision 0) +++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/torture/20110718-1.c (revision 0) @@ -0,0 +1,17 @@ +/* { dg-do run } */ + +extern void abort (void); +struct X { unsigned long i : 33; }; +unsigned long __attribute__((noinline)) +foo (struct X *p) +{ + return ~p->i; +} +int main() +{ + struct X x; + x.i = -1; + if (foo (&x) != 0) + abort (); + return 0; +}