I would appreciate it if you would do it.
-- Caroline Tice cmt...@google.com On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 4:55 PM, Gerald Pfeifer <ger...@pfeifer.com> wrote: > On Sun, 8 Sep 2013, Caroline Tice wrote: >> I believe I have addressed all the issues with the Vtable Verification >> feature. I have updated the announcement patch, and have attached the >> updated patch. Is this OK to commit? > > Eeh, I just noticed nobody ever applied the patch below. :-( > Sorry about that. > > It's too late for the main page now, but can you push this > into the appropriate place of news.html (or let me know, and > I'll do it)? > > Gerald > > Index: htdocs/index.html > =================================================================== > RCS file: /cvs/gcc/wwwdocs/htdocs/index.html,v > retrieving revision 1.890 > diff -r1.890 index.html > 55a56,64 >> <dt><span>The Vtable Verification Feature is now in GCC</span> >> <span class="date">[2013-09-08]</span></dt> >> <dd>The <a href="http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/vtv";>vtable verification</a> >> branch has been merged into trunk. This adds a new security feature >> for C++ programs, to detect/prevent vtable pointer corruption or attacks. >> For more details see the documentation on the feature wiki page. This work >> was contributed by Caroline Tice, Luis Lozano and Geoff Pike of Google, >> and Benjamin Kosnik of Red Hat.</dd> >> >
