On Tue, Apr 07, 2015 at 11:01:59AM -0400, Vladimir Makarov wrote: > 2015-04-07 Vladimir Makarov <vmaka...@redhat.com> > > PR target/65678 > * lra-remat.c (do_remat): Process input and non-input insn > registers separately.
Don't have a quick access to arm box right now (without waiting for it to be installed etc.), but using a cross-compiler I can at least reproduce that your patch changes also: /* PR target/65648 */ int a = 0, *b = 0, c = 0; static int d = 0; short e = 1; static long long f = 0; long long *i = &f; unsigned char j = 0; __attribute__((noinline, noclone)) void foo (int x, int *y) { asm volatile ("" : : "r" (x), "r" (y) : "memory"); } __attribute__((noinline, noclone)) void bar (const char *x, long long y) { asm volatile ("" : : "r" (x), "r" (&y) : "memory"); if (y != 0) __builtin_abort (); } int main () { int k = 0; b = &k; j = (!a) - (c <= e); *i = j; foo (a, &k); bar ("", f); return 0; } so, if anybody can confirm this testcase aborts with -march=armv6-m -mthumb -Os before Vlad's patch and doesn't abort afterwards, perhaps just sticking that into gcc.c-torture/execute/pr65648.c would be sufficient. Or, if people don't regularly test with -march=armv6-m -mthumb combination, perhaps put it into gcc.c-torture/execute/pr65648.c as is and add another gcc.target/arm/pr65648.c testcase that will #include this one, and use the right dg-options / dg-skip-if or dg-require-effective-target etc. for it to trigger. As the testcase uses uninitialized r3 in the wrong case, I wonder if the usual _start initializes r3 to some value that triggers the abort without the fix; if not, perhaps it needs to be in another function and the caller should somehow attempt to set l3 somehow (pass arguments to another function etc.) to a value that will trigger the abort. Jakub