On 07/04/15 15:09 +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Mon, Apr 06, 2015 at 09:31:28PM -0500, Bill Schmidt wrote:
It was recently pointed out that we still don't have a separate
baseline_symbols.txt for powerpc64le-linux-gnu. This patch modifies
configure.host to create a new abi_baseline_pair for powerpc64le and
provides the generated symbol file (from "make new-abi-baseline").
Is this ok for stage4, or should I hold it until after 5.1 branches?
[Please CC libstdc++ patches to the libstdc++ list as well as
gcc-patches, thanks]
What other target has the baseline_symbols.txt closest to the
powerpc64le-linux-gnu one? Can you post the diff from that one, say
powerpc64-linux-gnu or whatever other 64-bit one that has the smallest diff.
Yes, that would be useful.
There may also be symbols missing that should be in the baseline:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65670
There are important details like if the TLS symbols are omitted (otherwise
you get failures when trying to build the compiler with TLS disabled).
Otherwise, sure, updating baseline files is desirable before release, it
would be good to update them for the existing arches too, will try to do
that this week.
