> Unfortunately the proper fix did not make it to the mainlie (it probably will > next stage1). Building kernel is however important. Can you please fill it in > and mark it as a regression? I think I will implement a hack and track > everything > that refers user named labels and force it to partition 0. Ugly but probably > best we can do at the moment. > > It would help to track it as a regression.
Sorry, actually I don't think it's a regression. The kernel moved the BPF interpreter to a new file, so my old workaround (disabling LTO for the file) broke. But it has been broken in gcc for quite some time (and if it wasn't it probably was just by partitioning accident) Would be still good to fix it though, if not too intrusive. -Andi