Hi!

For %rip addressing, we only can use disp32 and thus can add
constants to the symbol/label, but not a register etc., as
there is no instruction supporting (plus (symbol_ref) (reg))
for PIC.

Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux and i686-linux, ok for trunk?

2015-03-27  Jakub Jelinek  <ja...@redhat.com>

        PR target/65593
        * config/i386/i386.c (legitimize_pic_address): If base
        is SYMBOL_REF or LABEL_REF using %rip addressing, force
        it to reg to avoid PLUS of SYMBOL_REF/LABEL_REF and register.

        * gcc.c-torture/compile/pr65593.c: New test.

--- gcc/config/i386/i386.c.jj   2015-03-23 16:31:27.000000000 +0100
+++ gcc/config/i386/i386.c      2015-03-27 14:19:54.646117550 +0100
@@ -13881,6 +13881,12 @@ legitimize_pic_address (rtx orig, rtx re
                }
              else
                {
+                 /* For %rip addressing, we have to use just disp32, not
+                    base nor index.  */
+                 if (TARGET_64BIT
+                     && (GET_CODE (base) == SYMBOL_REF
+                         || GET_CODE (base) == LABEL_REF))
+                   base = force_reg (mode, base);
                  if (GET_CODE (new_rtx) == PLUS
                      && CONSTANT_P (XEXP (new_rtx, 1)))
                    {
--- gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/compile/pr65593.c.jj    2015-03-27 
14:40:55.973767411 +0100
+++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/compile/pr65593.c       2015-03-27 
14:42:19.697417036 +0100
@@ -0,0 +1,4 @@
+/* PR target/65593 */
+/* { dg-additional-options "-fpie" { target pie } } */
+
+#include "pr20928.c"

        Jakub

Reply via email to