> -----Original Message----- > From: Jeff Law [mailto:l...@redhat.com] > Sent: 25 March 2015 12:27 > To: Honggyu Kim; gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org > Cc: Kyrylo Tkachov; seg...@kernel.crashing.org; christophe.l...@st.com > Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] New testcase to check parameter passing bug > > On 03/18/15 19:40, Honggyu Kim wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I have modified the test-case to check parameter passing bug based on > > the comments from Kyrill Tkachov, Christophe Lyon, and Segher > > Boessenkool as follows: > > 1. move from "gcc.target/arm" to "gcc.dg" > > 2. change "dg-do compile" to "dg-do run" > > > > Please let me know if there's still something to fix more. > > Thanks for your comment. > > > > Honggyu > > --- > > gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog | 4 ++++ > > gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr65358.c | 33 > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > 2 files changed, 37 insertions(+) > > create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr65358.c > > > > diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog b/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog index > > 77d24a1..218f908 100644 > > --- a/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog > > +++ b/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog > > @@ -1,3 +1,7 @@ > > +2015-03-19 Honggyu Kim <hong.gyu....@lge.com> > > + > > + * gcc.dg/pr65358.c: New test. > This should be included as part of Kyrill's patch. If the test goes in without > Kryill's fix, then it'll just create testsuite noise.
I'll make sure to commit this together with my fix (at https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-03/msg01014.html) if it gets approved. I agree that there's no point taking the test in by itself . Thanks, Kyrill > > Jeff >
