Steven Bosscher <stevenb....@gmail.com> wrote: > This patch merely papers over another issue, probably a missing > CROSSING_JUMP_P test.
Perhaps. Surely it has looked the current DBR is not so well for
crossing jumps and my fix might be a bit ad-hoc.
The first part of the patch could be rewritten with checking if one
of the following jumps is crossing, though I thought that checking
NOTE_INSN_SWITCH_TEXT_SECTIONS is straight forward to see the jump
is trivial or not.
Regards,
kaz
