On March 23, 2015 8:54:54 PM GMT+01:00, Jakub Jelinek <ja...@redhat.com> wrote:
>Hi!
>
>On the following testcase we ICE, because we don't verify we have the
>ERF_RETURNS_ARG argument, on non-verified builtins that is possible.
>Other uses of ERF_RETURNS_ARG seem to verify it.
>Also, there was an unneeded extra gimple_call_return_flags call,
>the condition has already checked that ERF_RETURNS_ARG flag is set.
>
>Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux and i686-linux, ok for trunk?

OK.

Thanks,
Richard.

>2015-03-23  Jakub Jelinek  <ja...@redhat.com>
>
>       PR target/65523
>       * tree-chkp.c (chkp_build_returned_bound): Ignore
>       ERF_RETURNS_ARG calls if they have fewer than needed arguments.
>
>       * gcc.target/i386/pr65523.c: New test.
>
>--- gcc/tree-chkp.c.jj 2015-03-09 08:05:05.000000000 +0100
>+++ gcc/tree-chkp.c    2015-03-23 14:37:52.469289930 +0100
>@@ -2153,6 +2153,7 @@ chkp_build_returned_bound (gcall *call)
>   tree bounds;
>   gimple stmt;
>   tree fndecl = gimple_call_fndecl (call);
>+  unsigned int retflags;
> 
>   /* To avoid fixing alloca expands in targets we handle
>      it separately.  */
>@@ -2196,12 +2197,11 @@ chkp_build_returned_bound (gcall *call)
>     }
>   /* Do not use retbnd when returned bounds are equal to some
>      of passed bounds.  */
>-  else if (gimple_call_return_flags (call) & ERF_RETURNS_ARG)
>+  else if (((retflags = gimple_call_return_flags (call)) &
>ERF_RETURNS_ARG)
>+         && (retflags & ERF_RETURN_ARG_MASK) < gimple_call_num_args (call))
>     {
>       gimple_stmt_iterator iter = gsi_for_stmt (call);
>-      unsigned int retarg = 0, argno;
>-      if (gimple_call_return_flags (call) & ERF_RETURNS_ARG)
>-      retarg = gimple_call_return_flags (call) & ERF_RETURN_ARG_MASK;
>+      unsigned int retarg = retflags & ERF_RETURN_ARG_MASK, argno;
>       if (gimple_call_with_bounds_p (call))
>       {
>         for (argno = 0; argno < gimple_call_num_args (call); argno++)
>--- gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr65523.c.jj 2015-03-23
>14:44:36.977729292 +0100
>+++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr65523.c    2015-03-23
>14:45:17.518071777 +0100
>@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
>+/* PR target/65523 */
>+/* { dg-do compile } */
>+/* { dg-options "-fcheck-pointer-bounds -mmpx" } */
>+
>+void *memmove ();
>+
>+void *
>+bar ()
>+{
>+  return memmove ();
>+}
>
>       Jakub


Reply via email to