The patch below fixes a failure of the test on powerpc64.
The test looks for the lxv (Load VSX Vector) instruction
which is emitted on powerpc64le but on powerpc64 gcc emits
an lvx (Load Vector Indexed). Both are correct here.
Is this okay to commit to trunk?
Martin
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog b/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
index 884fb62..d781c02 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
@@ -1,3 +1,9 @@
+2015-03-23 Martin Sebor <mse...@redhat.com>
+
+ PR testsuite/63175
+ * gcc.dg/vect/costmodel/ppc/costmodel-bb-slp-9a-pr63175.c: Scan
+ assembly for lvx in addition to lxv.
+
2015-03-20 Richard Biener <rguent...@suse.de>
PR middle-end/64715
diff --git
a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/costmodel/ppc/costmodel-bb-slp-9a-pr63175.c
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/costmodel/ppc/costmodel-bb-slp-9a-pr63175.c
index 73c0afa..9f3c89c 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/costmodel/ppc/costmodel-bb-slp-9a-pr63175.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/costmodel/ppc/costmodel-bb-slp-9a-pr63175.c
@@ -25,6 +25,6 @@ main1 (void)
with no word loads (lw, lwu, lwz, lwzu, or their indexed forms)
or word stores (stw, stwu, stwx, stwux, or their indexed forms). */
-/* { dg-final { scan-assembler "\t\(lxv|lvsr|stxv\)" } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler "\t\(lvx|lxv|lvsr|stxv\)" } } */
/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-not "\tlwz?u?x? " } } */
/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-not "\tstwu?x? " } } */
