On Thu, 2015-03-12 at 14:20 +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
> After noticing tree-parloop.c passing crap to split_block (a tree
> rather than a gimple or an rtx) I noticed those CFG functions simply
> take void * pointers.  The following patch fixes that and adds
> two overloads, one for GIMPLE use and one for RTL use.
> 
> Bootstrapped on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, testing in progress.
> 
> Ok at this stage?
> 
> Thanks,
> Richard.
> 
> 2015-03-12  Richard Biener  <rguent...@suse.de>
> 
>       * cfghooks.h (create_basic_block): Replace with two overloads
>       for RTL and GIMPLE.
>       (split_block): Likewise.
>       * cfghooks.c (split_block): Rename to ...
>       (split_block_1): ... this.
>       (split_block): Add two type-safe overloads for RTL and GIMPLE.
>       (split_block_after_labels): Call split_block_1.
>       (create_basic_block): Rename to ...
>       (create_basic_block_1): ... this.
>       (create_basic_block): Add two type-safe overloads for RTL and GIMPLE.
>       (create_empty_bb): Call create_basic_block_1.
>       * cfgrtl.c (fixup_fallthru_exit_predecessor): Use
>       split_block_after_labels.
>       * omp-low.c (expand_parallel_call): Likewise.
>       (expand_omp_target): Likewise.
>       (simd_clone_adjust): Likewise.
>       * tree-chkp.c (chkp_get_entry_block): Likewise.
>       * cgraphunit.c (init_lowered_empty_function): Use the GIMPLE
>       create_basic_block overload.
>       (cgraph_node::expand_thunk): Likewise.
>       * tree-cfg.c (make_blocks): Likewise.
>       (handle_abnormal_edges): Likewise.
>       * tree-inline.c (copy_bb): Likewise.
> 
> Index: gcc/cfghooks.c
> ===================================================================
> --- gcc/cfghooks.c    (revision 221379)
> +++ gcc/cfghooks.c    (working copy)

[...snip...]

> +edge
> +split_block (basic_block bb, rtx i)
> +{
> +  return split_block_1 (bb, i);
> +}

Possibly a dumb question, but could this take an rtx_insn * rather than
a plain rtx?

> +basic_block
> +create_basic_block (rtx head, rtx end, basic_block after)
> +{
> +  return create_basic_block_1 (head, end, after);
> +}

Likewise for head and end... though I see a fix would be needed in
bfin.c:hwloop_optimize, at least.

 
> Index: gcc/cfghooks.h
> ===================================================================
> --- gcc/cfghooks.h    (revision 221379)
> +++ gcc/cfghooks.h    (working copy)

> -extern edge split_block (basic_block, void *);
> +extern edge split_block (basic_block, rtx);
(etc)

> -extern basic_block create_basic_block (void *, void *, basic_block);
> +extern basic_block create_basic_block (rtx, rtx, basic_block);
(etc)


Reply via email to