On 03/17/2015 04:35 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
I'll test both. In the common case, the cost is going to be the basic
bookkeeping so that we can compute the transparent property. The
actual
computation of transparency and everything else is guarded on having
something in the hash tables -- and the overwhelming majority of the
time there's nothing in the hash tables.
Regardless, I'll pin down boxes and do some testing.
I'm slightly leaning towards trying it even in stage4, but if e.g.
richi
disagrees, we could defer it to stage1 too.
I'd be OK either way. I just want us to make a decision one way or the
If it fixes a regression then OK for trunk, otherwise please wait for stage 1
to open.
It fixes 64317 which is a P2 regression.
jeff
