On 3/10/2015 21:18, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > On 10/03/15 20:55 +0100, John Marino wrote: >> On 3/10/2015 20:23, Jonathan Wakely wrote: >>> John, assuming I'm right that dragonfly supports all these features, >>> could you test this change? (You'll need the same change on line >>> 19555 of the libstdc++-v3/configure script.) >>> >> >> Sure, I can test it. How can I tell if the result is successful? >> Successful build versus failed build? > > Yes, that should be enough. If any of sched_yield(), nanosleep(), > clock_gettime() etc. is missing you'll get a build failure. > > I'll do a full testsuite run (bootstrap and 'make check') on dragonfly > before committing, but I'll need some time to resurrect the dragonfly > VM I was using previously.
Hi Jonathan, gcc 5 built fine on DragonFly with your patch: http://muscles.dragonflybsd.org/bulk/bleeding-edge-potential/20150310_142205/logs/gcc5-5.0.s20150308.log Regards, John