On Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at 3:14 PM, Uros Bizjak <ubiz...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 7:23 PM, Richard Henderson <r...@redhat.com> wrote: > >>> Unfortunately, while "normal" bootstrap works OK with alpha-linux-gnu >>> and alphaev68-linux-gnu, the bootstrap still fails when configured >>> --with-build-config=bootstrap-lto: >>> >>> libbackend.a(tree-data-ref.o): In function `non_affine_dependence_relation': >>> /space/uros/gcc-build-profiled/gcc/../../gcc-svn/trunk/gcc/tree-data-ref.c:1661:(.text+0x1b8): >>> relocation truncated to fit: GPREL16 against symbol `dump_file' >>> defined in .sbss section in libbackend.a(dumpfile.o) >> >> Interesting. And using bootstrap-lto works with --no-relax? I don't believe >> I've ever tried it... > > Yes, I can re-confirm, that Rev: 221041 can bootstrap with > -Wl,--no-relax patch on alphaev68-linux-gnu, when configured with > "--with-build-config=bootstrap-lto --disable-werror > --enable-languages=c,c++,fortran" with binutils 2.25. I will post > testresults when bootstrap+regression test finish.
Results are here [1]. [1] https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2015-03/msg00346.html Uros.
