> Le 10 févr. 2015 à 12:42, Tom de Vries <tom_devr...@mentor.com> a écrit : > > I think we need to understand first what's going on.
Sure, my patch was mainly to silence the failures on my working tree. > In both test-cases, on Linux with -fpic the inlining of one function into the > other is not done, because we cannot be sure the function call in one > function binds to the other function at runtime. I don’t understand why -fpic should change the inlining decision (except register pressure and so on). > So, is the inlining happening with -fpic for Darwin? If so, is that correct? The inlining is happening for darwin. I don’t know if that is correct or not. The test has been introduced at r143947 (Thu Feb 5 00:29:48 2009) and the only failures I have seen are due to r 220532 (checked back to r154691). Dominique > Thanks, > - Tom
