On Feb 4, 2015, at 2:28 AM, Rainer Orth <r...@cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de> wrote: > Rainer Orth <r...@cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de> writes: >>> On Jan 28, 2015, Mike Stump <mikest...@comcast.net> wrote: >>>> On Jan 28, 2015, at 2:27 AM, Rainer Orth <r...@cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de> >>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> * Remove the definition of _XOPEN_SOURCE completely.
>>>> I think I prefer this one… >>>> and there is no hint what host caused him to put the change in >>> >>> The 2005 timeframe suggests it was probably GNU/Linux >> I'm with Mike here: either we remove the _XOPEN_SOURCE definition now > It's been a week now since I posted the patches and there's still no > conclusion which of the two alternatives to install. Well, my position is the removal of _XOPEN_SOURCE is the right patch. I’ve not seen any substantive disagreement. I’d post and test that patch. A build person, a libobjc person, a reasonably an affected target person or a global person can approve in my book. I’m not any of them… If Pinski is happy with my approving it, he can weigh in. I’d be happy to approve it.
