Hi Kaz!

On Wed, 04 Feb 2015 08:41:28 +0900 (JST), Kaz Kojima <kkoj...@rr.iij4u.or.jp> 
wrote:
> Several goacc/acc_on_device tests fail for a few targets:
> 
> hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11 (PR testsuite/64850)
> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2015-01/msg02659.html
> 
> m68k-unknown-linux-gnu
> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2015-01/msg02960.html
> 
> sh4-unknown-linux-gnu
> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2015-01/msg02930.html
> 
> Also they fail with special options
> x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu -fpic -mcmodel=large
> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2015-02/msg00198.html

Thanks for looking into this -- incidentally, I also started looking into
it yesterday...  :-)

> Those tests scan .expand rtl dumps to get the number of calls for
> acc_on_device function.  For almost targets, the call rtx looks
> something like
> 
>   (call (mem:QI (symbol_ref:SI ("acc_on_device") [flags 0x41]  <function_decl 
> 0xb7614100 acc_on_device>) [0 acc_on_device S1 A8])
> 
> and tests use the regular expression "\\\(call \[^\\n\]*\\\"acc_on_device"
> to detect it.
> This expression doesn't match with the corresponding call rtx
> 
>   (call (mem:SI (symbol_ref/v:SI ("@acc_on_device") [flags 0x41]  
> <function_decl 0xb764d900 acc_on_device>) [0 acc_on_device S4 A32])
> 
> for hppa and something like
> 
>   (call (mem:QI (reg/f:SI 33) [0 acc_on_device S1 A8])
> 
> for m68k and sh.  All call rtxes have the function name in
> the alias set of its mem rtx and it seems that the regular
> expression "\\\(call \[^\\n\]* acc_on_device" works for all
> cases.  The attached patch is tested on i686-pc-linux-gnu and
> sh4-unknown-linux-gnu.

>       PR testsuite/64850
>       * gcc.dg/goacc/acc_on_device-1.c: Use a space instead of \\\" in
>       the expression to find calls.
>       * c-c++-common/goacc/acc_on_device-2.c: Likewise.
>       * c-c++-common/goacc/acc_on_device-2-off.c: Likewise.
>       * gfortran.dg/goacc/acc_on_device-1.f95: Likewise.
>       * gfortran.dg/goacc/acc_on_device-2.f95: Likewise.
>       * gfortran.dg/goacc/acc_on_device-2-off.f95: Likewise.

The other idea that I had is to separately scan/count the symbol_ref and
the call (or call_insn?), but I'm not sure if that is "better".  So, your
patch looks good to me, thanks!

> diff --git a/c-c++-common/goacc/acc_on_device-2-off.c 
> b/c-c++-common/goacc/acc_on_device-2-off.c
> index 25d21ad..ea31047 100644
> --- a/c-c++-common/goacc/acc_on_device-2-off.c
> +++ b/c-c++-common/goacc/acc_on_device-2-off.c
> @@ -20,6 +20,6 @@ f (void)
>  }
>  
>  /* Without -fopenacc, we're expecting one call.
> -   { dg-final { scan-rtl-dump-times "\\\(call \[^\\n\]*\\\"acc_on_device" 1 
> "expand" } } */
> +   { dg-final { scan-rtl-dump-times "\\\(call \[^\\n\]* acc_on_device" 1 
> "expand" } } */
>  
>  /* { dg-final { cleanup-rtl-dump "expand" } } */
> diff --git a/c-c++-common/goacc/acc_on_device-2.c 
> b/c-c++-common/goacc/acc_on_device-2.c
> index d5389a9..2f4ee2b 100644
> --- a/c-c++-common/goacc/acc_on_device-2.c
> +++ b/c-c++-common/goacc/acc_on_device-2.c
> @@ -24,6 +24,6 @@ f (void)
>     perturbs expansion as a builtin, which expects an int parameter.  It's 
> fine
>     when changing acc_device_t to plain int, but that's not what we're doing 
> in
>     <openacc.h>.
> -   { dg-final { scan-rtl-dump-times "\\\(call \[^\\n\]*\\\"acc_on_device" 0 
> "expand" { xfail c++ } } } */
> +   { dg-final { scan-rtl-dump-times "\\\(call \[^\\n\]* acc_on_device" 0 
> "expand" { xfail c++ } } } */
>  
>  /* { dg-final { cleanup-rtl-dump "expand" } } */
> diff --git a/gcc.dg/goacc/acc_on_device-1.c b/gcc.dg/goacc/acc_on_device-1.c
> index 1a0276e..d0dbc82 100644
> --- a/gcc.dg/goacc/acc_on_device-1.c
> +++ b/gcc.dg/goacc/acc_on_device-1.c
> @@ -15,6 +15,6 @@ f (void)
>  }
>  
>  /* Unsuitable to be handled as a builtin, so we're expecting four calls.
> -   { dg-final { scan-rtl-dump-times "\\\(call \[^\\n\]*\\\"acc_on_device" 4 
> "expand" } } */
> +   { dg-final { scan-rtl-dump-times "\\\(call \[^\\n\]* acc_on_device" 4 
> "expand" } } */
>  
>  /* { dg-final { cleanup-rtl-dump "expand" } } */
> diff --git a/gfortran.dg/goacc/acc_on_device-1.f95 
> b/gfortran.dg/goacc/acc_on_device-1.f95
> index 9dfde26..0126d9c 100644
> --- a/gfortran.dg/goacc/acc_on_device-1.f95
> +++ b/gfortran.dg/goacc/acc_on_device-1.f95
> @@ -17,6 +17,6 @@ logical function f ()
>  end function f
>  
>  ! Unsuitable to be handled as a builtin, so we're expecting four calls.
> -! { dg-final { scan-rtl-dump-times "\\\(call \[^\\n\]*\\\"acc_on_device" 4 
> "expand" } }
> +! { dg-final { scan-rtl-dump-times "\\\(call \[^\\n\]* acc_on_device" 4 
> "expand" } }
>  
>  ! { dg-final { cleanup-rtl-dump "expand" } }
> diff --git a/gfortran.dg/goacc/acc_on_device-2-off.f95 
> b/gfortran.dg/goacc/acc_on_device-2-off.f95
> index cf28264..0a4978e 100644
> --- a/gfortran.dg/goacc/acc_on_device-2-off.f95
> +++ b/gfortran.dg/goacc/acc_on_device-2-off.f95
> @@ -34,6 +34,6 @@ logical (4) function f ()
>  end function f
>  
>  ! Without -fopenacc, we're expecting one call.
> -! { dg-final { scan-rtl-dump-times "\\\(call \[^\\n\]*\\\"acc_on_device" 1 
> "expand" } }
> +! { dg-final { scan-rtl-dump-times "\\\(call \[^\\n\]* acc_on_device" 1 
> "expand" } }
>  
>  ! { dg-final { cleanup-rtl-dump "expand" } }
> diff --git a/gfortran.dg/goacc/acc_on_device-2.f95 
> b/gfortran.dg/goacc/acc_on_device-2.f95
> index 7730a60..43ad022 100644
> --- a/gfortran.dg/goacc/acc_on_device-2.f95
> +++ b/gfortran.dg/goacc/acc_on_device-2.f95
> @@ -35,6 +35,6 @@ end function f
>  
>  ! With -fopenacc, we're expecting the builtin to be expanded, so no calls.
>  ! TODO: not working.
> -! { dg-final { scan-rtl-dump-times "\\\(call \[^\\n\]*\\\"acc_on_device" 0 
> "expand" { xfail *-*-* } } }
> +! { dg-final { scan-rtl-dump-times "\\\(call \[^\\n\]* acc_on_device" 0 
> "expand" { xfail *-*-* } } }
>  
>  ! { dg-final { cleanup-rtl-dump "expand" } }


Grüße,
 Thomas

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to