As discussed in PR61225, we won't be able to fix the minor regression here
for GCC 5, so let's XFAIL this test for ia32.
Tested on x86_64-linux -m32 and -m64. Okay for mainline?
Segher
2015-02-03 Segher Boessenkool <seg...@kernel.crashing.org>
gcc/testsuite/
PR middle-end/61225
gcc.target/i386/pr49095.c: XFAIL for ia32.
---
gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr49095.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr49095.c
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr49095.c
index b7d1fb2..cc79da2 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr49095.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr49095.c
@@ -70,4 +70,5 @@ G (short)
G (int)
G (long)
-/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-not "test\[lq\]" } } */
+/* See PR61225 for the XFAIL. */
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-not "test\[lq\]" { xfail { ia32 } } } } */
--
1.8.1.4
