Dear Dominique,

On transferring from my laptop to my workstation, I find that it
segfaults in runtime - both are x86_64/FC21. If I can, I intend to
investigate tonight.

Thanks for the report.

Paul

On 2 February 2015 at 17:53, Dominique Dhumieres <domi...@lps.ens.fr> wrote:
> Dear Paul,
>
> I have tested your patch at 
> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2015-01/txtwnaoa1115V.txt
> (the latest version) and I found that the test type_to_class_3.f03 is 
> miscompiled
> (FAIL) with -flto -O0 -m64 (this does not happens with -flto -O0 -m32 or with 
> -Ox and
> x!=0).
>
> In addition, while the reduced test
>
>   type :: Test
>     integer :: i
>   end type
>
>   type :: TestReference
>      class(Test), allocatable :: test(:)
>   end type
>
>   type(TestReference) :: testList
>   type(test), allocatable :: x(:)
>
>  allocate (testList%test(2), source = [Test(99), Test(199)]) ! Works, of 
> course
>  print *, size(testList%test)
>  x = testList%test
>  print *, x
> end
>
> gives what I expect, i.e.,
>
>            2
>           99         199
>
>   type :: Test
>     integer :: i
>   end type
>
>   type :: TestReference
>      class(Test), allocatable :: test(:)
>   end type
>
>   type(TestReference) :: testList
>   type(test), allocatable :: x(:)
>
>   testList = TestReference([Test(99), Test(199)])  ! Gave: The rank of the 
> element in the
>                                                    ! structure constructor at 
> (1) does not
>                                                    ! match that of the 
> component (1/0)
>   print *, size(testList%test)
>   x = testList%test
>   print *, x
> end
>
> gives
>
>            1
>           99
>
> Last problem I see,
>
> print *, TestReference([Test(99), Test(199)])
>
> gives the following ICE
>
> f951: internal compiler error: Bad IO basetype (7)
>
> type_to_class_3_red_2.f03:12:0:
>
>    print *, TestReference([Test(99), Test(199)])
>
>
> Cheers,
>
> Dominique



-- 
Outside of a dog, a book is a man's best friend. Inside of a dog it's
too dark to read.

Groucho Marx

Reply via email to