On January 30, 2015 5:33:43 PM CET, Mike Stump <mikest...@comcast.net> wrote: >On Jan 29, 2015, at 7:16 PM, Andrew Pinski <pins...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 6:58 PM, Mike Stump <mikest...@comcast.net> >wrote: >>> On Jan 29, 2015, at 4:15 PM, Joseph Myers <jos...@codesourcery.com> >wrote: >>>> The patch is OK for GCC 6 >>> >>> We will be releasing 5.x compilers for the next decade?! Does he >really have to wait 10 years? >>> >>> Why not, just OK for stage 1? >> >> You missed the memo on the versioning scheme change. GCC 5.1 is >going >> to the first released version of GCC 5. GCC 5.2 will be the next >> patched version of GCC 5. GCC 6 is the next major release of GCC. > >Ah, I kinda discounted that as it went by it seems. It seems most >other players go the other way, as the numbers get large, the first one >fixes, and then they add numbers at the bottom. Thanks.
You obviously missed the Marketing 101 course ;) Richard.
