On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 01:11:01PM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
> > I agree that freeing the cfg and immediately computing it again doesn't make
> > sense, but I just don't see this patch being incompatible with that.
>
> I wonder if handing over pass pipeline control to targets at
> machine_reorg time (including free_cfg) makes sense...
> (either giving control back for stuff like final() or make it call
> into the middle-end again).
Perhaps, but not sure if such changes are desirable for stage4.
And certainly unsuitable for release branches.
Jakub
