The following should fix gcc.dg/vect/vect-33.c failing on arm
by properly guarding the scan-tree-dumps for vect64 tagets that
also can vectorize with v16qi. I've choosen to use
vect_multiple_sizes for that, hoping we don't have targets
that do vect32.
Reliably writing vectorizer testcases gets harder and harder... :/
For the second half we really need to fix SPARC to be a vect64
target (the testcase is vectorized with v8qi).
Applied to trunk.
Richard.
2015-01-23 Richard Biener <rguent...@suse.de>
PR testsuite/63439
* gcc.dg/vect/vect-33.c: Adjust target selectors for v16qi
vectorization on vect64 targets.
Index: gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/vect-33.c
===================================================================
--- gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/vect-33.c (revision 220030)
+++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/vect-33.c (working copy)
@@ -38,7 +38,7 @@ int main (void)
/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "vectorized 1 loops" 1 "vect" } } */
-/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump "Vectorizing an unaligned access" "vect" {
target { vect_hw_misalign && { ! vect64 } } } } } */
-/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump "Alignment of access forced using peeling"
"vect" { target { vector_alignment_reachable && vect64 } } } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump "Vectorizing an unaligned access" "vect" {
target { vect_hw_misalign && { {! vect64} || vect_multiple_sizes } } } } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump "Alignment of access forced using peeling"
"vect" { target { vector_alignment_reachable && { vect64 && {!
vect_multiple_sizes} } } } } } */
/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "Alignment of access forced using
versioning" 1 "vect" { target { { {! vector_alignment_reachable} || {! vect64}
} && {! vect_hw_misalign} } } } } */
/* { dg-final { cleanup-tree-dump "vect" } } */
